INVESTIGATING THE PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES USED IN EVERYDAY REASONING AND ARGUMENTATION.

INVESTIGATING THE PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES USED IN EVERYDAY REASONING AND ARGUMENTATION.

Abstract:
Everyday reasoning and argumentation play vital roles in human communication, decision-making, and problem-solving processes. This study aims to investigate the principles and techniques employed in everyday reasoning and argumentation, shedding light on the cognitive processes underlying these fundamental aspects of human thinking.

The research explores the key principles that guide everyday reasoning, including deduction, induction, and abduction. Deduction involves drawing logical conclusions from given premises, while induction involves inferring general principles from specific observations. Abduction, on the other hand, involves generating plausible explanations or hypotheses to account for observed phenomena.

Furthermore, the study analyzes the techniques commonly employed in everyday argumentation. These techniques include logical reasoning, evidence evaluation, counterargumentation, and persuasive strategies. Logical reasoning involves constructing valid and sound arguments using deductive and inductive reasoning. Evidence evaluation entails critically assessing the reliability, relevance, and credibility of supporting evidence. Counterargumentation involves anticipating and addressing opposing viewpoints to strengthen one’s argument. Finally, persuasive strategies encompass the use of rhetorical devices, emotional appeals, and persuasive language to convince others.

To investigate these principles and techniques, the study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative analysis of real-world reasoning and argumentation instances with quantitative surveys and experiments. Real-life scenarios, such as political debates, online discussions, and everyday conversations, serve as rich sources of data for qualitative analysis. Surveys and experiments provide quantitative data to examine the prevalence, effectiveness, and impact of different reasoning and argumentation techniques.

The findings of this research contribute to a deeper understanding of how individuals engage in everyday reasoning and argumentation. By uncovering the underlying cognitive processes and strategies, this study offers insights into human decision-making, communication patterns, and problem-solving dynamics. The results can have implications for various domains, including education, psychology, rhetoric, and public discourse.

Keywords: everyday reasoning, argumentation, deduction, induction, abduction, logical reasoning, evidence evaluation, counterargumentation, persuasive strategies.

INVESTIGATING THE PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUES USED IN EVERYDAY REASONING AND ARGUMENTATION. GET MORE PHILOSOPHY PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS