A study on the importance of branding and packaging on marketing productivity of locally made product

  • : Ms Word Format
  • : 78 Pages
  • : ₦3000
  • : 1-5 Chapters
  • Click to DOWNLOAD Materials




This study sought to determine the effects of packaging and branding on marketing productivity of Local made products with kingmos paints Ltd, Uyo take as the   focal point of study. A descriptive research was conducted and a judgmental sampling technique was used to select   thirty (30)  staff of the company. However, only twenty-six (26) responded to the questionnaire Research question were asked to guide the study. The instrument   for the study was the questionnaire.  Data collected were analyzed by used of descriptive statistics- frequencies and simple percentages. The finding of the study revealed that the firm under   study adopted the manufacture brand name for its products that it branded its product to serve as basis for advertising  furthermore; it  revealed that  effective package prevents chemical change of the  product. It was also revealed that packaging and branding has the selects of sales increase and increasing profits.  The paper provided recommendations that companies need to have good brand name for their products by employing brands managers, and that packaging technologists should be engaged in making packaging decisions. Also, it was recommended that more funds and time should be devoted by firms for packaging and branding.




In nowadays competitive marketing environment the role of package has changed due to increasing self-service and changing consumers’ lifestyle. Firms’ interest in package as a promotional tool is growing increasingly. Package becomes an ultimate selling proposition stimulating impulsive buying behaviour, increasing market share and reducing promotional costs.

According to Rundh (2005:672) package attracts consumer’s attention to particular brand, enhances its image, and influences consumer’s perceptions about product. Also package imparts unique value to products and works as a tool for differentiation, i.e. helps consumers to choose the product from wide range of similar products, stimulates customers buying behavior. Wells, Farley & Armstrong, (2007:680) opined that package performs an important role in marketing communications and could be treated as one of the most important tools of promotion. The primary function of branding and packaging is to protect the product against potential damage while transporting, storing, selling and exploiting a product and to ensure the convenience during performance of these activities. Grundvag&Ostil, (2009:220) indicates the importance of branding and packaging in the case of grocery, when consumers buy unbranded products. Seeing that most consumers tend to touch products before purchasing, they treat product branding and packaging as a tool for protecting consumers from contamination, for allowing them to touch products without restraint, without need to avoid smudging their hands. They propose to use branding and packaging with a “window”, in order to allow consumers to evaluate product by its appearance at the same time reducing “consumer uncertainty regarding quality by branding the product and labeling it” i.e. to communicate to consumer adequate message about product. It could be stating that in length of time a function of identification and communication became of vital importance especially for consumer products in the group of convenience goods.

Branding and packaging as a tool for communication was investigated by Gonzalez et al., (2007:63) Taking into consideration that impulsive buying is proper to many consumers it could be maintained that “branding and packaging may be the only communication between a product and the final consumer in the store”. Consequently the role of package in marketing communications increases: it must attract consumer’s attention and transmit adequate value of product to consumer in the short period right in the place of sale.

The role of branding and packaging has evolved from the traditional function of protecting the product against dirt, damage, theft, mishandling, and deterioration. This functional role is a requirement of all packages. In the modern era, branding and packaging is also utilized as a marketing tool to promote the product, to increase visibility of the product on the shelf, and to provide information to the customer (O’Shaughnessy 2005:105). In spite of branding and packaging use as a growing marketing tool, marketers still view branding and packaging as a container. Known marketing guru, Philip Kotler (2000, 418) defines branding and packaging as all activities of designing and producing the container for a product. Branding and packaging draws the attention of the consumer at point-of-sale through its attractive design and color, gives an indication of its contents, package can be a tool in educating the customer. Finally, the package contributes to the overall image of the brand. It is important to remember, however, that branding and packaging is not the only marketing and promotional tool. Meyers (2001:25)

The increasing importance of branding and packaging in the marketing mix has equaled and occasionally surpassed product advertising and sales promotion in the past thirty years.

The physical branding and packaging of a product can be used for many purposes, from the manufacturing point to the end users, such as the protective and promotive functions where it is called as a “silent protector” Long (2002:52) and a “silent salesman” Pilditch (2003:102). The branding and packaging not only delivers product information and brand identity, it also visually appeals to consumers and due to its protective function delivers the product undamaged. Besides, Branding and packaging plays an important role in helping consumers to recognize and understand the products.

When consumers go to retailers, they usually see the branding and packaging of products before they can see the products themselves. Therefore, the branding and packaging of products can be an effective tool for promotion in real shops Stewart, (2006:208).

According to Cateora (2002:405), a poorly packaged product conveys an impression of poor quality. Supermarkets have many products on the shelves each containing many items of information and there are very few sales people in a supermarket hence most selling is done through branding and packaging. The modern marketer should then see branding and packaging beyond its traditional role of holding contents together but as a promotional tool for his products which is the purpose of this study.

                1.2    STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Despite the increasing popularity of branding and packaging in the promotion of goods and services, one cannot but agree that there are areas of problems which need to be studied. Though some business organizations are now using branding and packaging to promote their wares yet many business organization in Nigeria concentrate their marketing effort on the traditional elements in the marketing mix in the performance of their marketing activities. The rate at which wares or products are being advertised, one may be forced to ask questions bothering on the use of branding and packaging.

In the application of marketing mix, many organizations are faced with branding and packaging problems. Some of the branding and packaging problems include; the need to know whether branding and packaging is a good promotional tool. In this regard, branding and packaging alone is not enough for promotion of goods and services. There is a great need to look at other marketing mix elements which usually comes first before branding and packaging, despite the fact that good branding and packaging promotes sales; wrong branding and packaging can lead to the total rejection of goods. Again, branding and packaging affect consumer buying decision, because wrong\bad branding and packaging can make a consumer not to buy a particular product. In this aspect branding and packaging needs to be suitable for each product in order to attract the attention of the consumers and also make them buy. Good branding and packaging also protects the image of the organisation, but some organisations do not have good branding and packaging system, thereby making their products to appear cheap and of low quality. Branding and packaging is not a good compliment or substitute for advertisement though good branding and packaging helps in advertisement.


                1.3    OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main aim of this research work is to analyze the role of branding and packaging as a promotional tool in the marketing of local product. The specific objectives includes:

  1. To analyze the extent branding and packaging influences buying behaviours.
  2. Find out the impact of a change in package on the sales of the local product.
  3. To ascertain whether brand branding and packaging promote the company’s image.
  4. To know the extent producers consider branding and packaging in their product decisions.
  5. To determine if consumers associate the appearance of a product to its quality.


                1.4    RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following questions will guide this study:

  1. To what extent does branding and packaging influence buying behaviour?
  2. What is the impact of a change of package on the sales of the local product?
  3. To what extent does brand product branding and packaging promote the image of the company?
  4. To what extent do producers consider branding and packaging in their product decisions?
  5. Do consumers associate the appearance of a product to its quality?


                1.5    RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

In analyzing the role of branding and packaging as a promotional tool in the marketing of local product, some tentative statements have to be tested hence the following hypothesis is put forward for this study:

  1. H0: There is no relationship between branding and packaging influence and buying behaviour.

H1: There is relationship between branding and packaging influence and buying behaviour.

  1. H0: There is no impact of change in the package of a product.

H1: There is impact of change in the package of a product.

  1. H0: There is no relationship between brand branding and packaging and company’s image.

H1: There is relationship between brand branding and packaging and company’s image.

  1. H0: The producers do not consider branding and packaging in their product decisions.

H1: The producers consider branding and packaging in their product decisions.

  1. H0: The consumers do not associate the appearance of a product to its quality.

H1:  The consumers associate the appearance of a product to its quality.


                1.6    SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This study will solve the research questions mentioned earlier and show the importance of branding and packaging as a promotional tool to both the manufacturers and consumers.

To the manufacturers, it will make them adopt a better approach to taking branding and packaging decisions; help them promote the image of the organisation and the brand.

To the consumers, it will show that package is part of the product they buy and may help to reduce dissatisfaction felt after buying a product, stimulate their buying behaviour and help them choose a product from a wide range of similar products.

Also, academic community will not be left out, because this work will serve as a fertile ground for researchers who wish to carry out a study on this topic.


                1.7    SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study will cover the analysis of the role of branding and packaging as a promotional tool in marketing of local product the researcher intends to use the manufacturers and consumers of  to carry out this research work. These manufacturers and consumers will provide the researcher with useful information that will be required to effectively carryout this research work.


                1.8    LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The main limitations of the study are uncooperative attitude of some manufacturers and consumers of the product of the companies taken into study, inadequacy of time, financial constraints and inadequate power supply. Some of those approached for information declined and refused to cooperate. This affected the volume of information available for the study. Again, limited time allocated for this research work did not provide room for accuracy and reliability of results.




Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product branding and packaging.       Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(2)


Butkeviciene, V., J. Stravinskiene and A. Rutelione (2008). ‘Impact of consumer   package communication on consumer decision making process’, InzinerineEkonomika-Engineering Economics(1)


Gonzalez M. P., Thorhsbury S., &Twede D. (2007). Branding and packaging as a tool for product  development: Communicating value to consumers. Journal of Food  Distribution Research, 38(1)


Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and

nd  managing brand equity, 2        ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.



Kotler, P. (2003) Marketing management, 9 ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.


Madden, T. J., Hewett, K., & Roth, M. S. (2000). Managing images in different  cultures: A cross-national study of color meanings and preferences. Journal of  International Marketing 8(4).


Rettie, R., & Brewer, C. (2000). The verbal and visual components of package  design. Journal of Product Brand Management, 9 (1).


Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of branding and packaging. British Food Journal, 107 (9).

Smith, P., & Taylor, J. (2004). Marketing communications: an integrated approach  (4th edition). London: Kogan Page.


Sogn-Grundvag, G., &Østli, J. (2009). Consumer evaluation of unbranded and  unlabelled food products: the case of bacalhau. European Journal of  Marketing, 43 (1/2).


Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product branding and packaging: creating  brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory  and Practice, Winter. 


Wells, L. E., Farley, H., & Armstrong, G. A. (2007). The importance of branding and packaging  design for own-label food brands. International Journal of Retail &  Distribution Management, 35 (9).


A STUDY ON THE IMPORTANCE OF BRANDING AND PACKAGING ON MARKETING PRODUCTIVITY OF LOCALLY MADE PRODUCTS, packaging and branding,effects of packaging and branding,marketing productivity of locally,marketing productivity,importance of branding and packaging, locally made products, locally made products


Sharing is caring!

Leave a Reply