PROJECTING A STATE IMAGE THROUGH THE THEATRE: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE RIVERS STATE COUNCIL FOR ARTS AND CULTURE.

ABSTRACT

The image of any state seems to depend on her public relations with others or foreign countries. The electronic media and the newspapers have been for decades the main contributors in this regard. This project highlights the theatrical activities of the Rivers State Council for Arts and Culture as vital panacea for the enhancement of the image of Rivers State. Divided in five chapters, chapter one is the introduction which deals with the background of study, purpose of study, scope and limitations of the study, justification of study and research methodology, definition of terms. Chapter two is concerned with the review of related literatures. Chapter three shall treat the historical development of Rivers State religion sociopolitical life, occupation and other economic activities; of the people it shall also treat the origin of Rivers State Council for Arts and Culture. In chapter four we shall discuss the performance and theatrical activities, the problems and prospects of the council and the image making theatre of Rivers State Council for Arts and Culture. In chapter five we would be summarizing and concluding all that we have discussed and treat recommendations and finally the bibliography.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       i

Certification     –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       ii

Dedication       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       iii

Acknowledgement    –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       iv

Abstract   –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       vi

Table of Contents     –       –       –       –       –       –       –       –       vii

CHAPTER ONE:      BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

1.1      Introduction

1.2      Purpose of the Study

1.3      Scope Limitation of the Study

1.4      Justification of Study

1.5      Research Methodology

1.6      Definition of Terms

CHAPTER TWO:     

2.1   Literature Review

CHAPTER THREE

3.1   Historical Development of Rivers State

3.2   Religious and Socio-Political Lives

3.3   Occupation and Economic Activities

3.4   Origin of the State Council for Arts and Culture

3.5   Organizational Structure

CHAPTER FOUR

4.1   Performances and Theatrical Activities of Rivers State Council for Arts and Culture

4.2   Problems and Prospects of the Council

4.3   Image Making Theatre and Rivers State Council for Arts and Culture

CHAPTER FIVE

5.1   Summary

5.2   Recommendation

5.3   Conclusion

        Bibliography

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 BACKGROUND TO STUDY

The theatre is known to have been alive to the socio-political realities of its time; a kind of court where the economic, social, religious and political issues of the society are outlined, evaluated and judged to bring about a better society, the theatre, it’s practitioners, and in fact, all the fine artists, are all vanguards of social change in their respective capacities – keeping watchful eyes and attentive ears on the happenings in the society.

In Nigeria, for instance, virtually all the new generation playwrights are committed to issues of social and political concerns of our time. The relevance of any play is dependent upon how well it is able to address the pressing issues of the playwright’s society. Hence, the radical dramatist is merely a respondent to such issues of social essence.

It will only amount to man’s inhumanity to man, a sin against oneself and the nation, should a Nigerian playwright, writing for a Nigerian audience today, choose to merely play to the gallery in the face of the numerous perceivable injustices in our immediate society. This, perhaps, is why Achebe posits that “any writer who tries to avoid the big social and political questions of his time will end up being completely, irrelevant to his society” (3). He likens such a writer to the absurdist man in an Igbo proverb, who leaves his burning house to pursue the rodents fleeing from the flames (13).

The radical playwright believes that the level of injustice, corruption and other forms of malpractices and moral decadence in contemporary society have got to where the art of speaking with the ‘tongue in the cheek’ on the stage alone is no longer enough, but rather demands an urgent and more direct representation for an immediate social reform. Femi Osofisan, one of the pioneer proponents of radical theatre movement in Nigeria believes that “if we warned ourselves often and painfully enough with reality, with the reality around us, if we refused to bandage our sensitive spots way from the hurts of truth, then we can attain a new and positive awareness” (4).

The radical theatre in Nigeria, just like its prototypes around the world should, as a matter of necessity, be committed to issues that will provide direct, matter-of-fact evaluation on the stage and bring them to the consciousness of the audience who would then begin to do something to sensitize the entire society and initiate an attitudinal change.

A review of the developmental trends in Nigerian theatre practice shows that from the post independent era to the present day, there has been a noticeable change in the tone of Nigerian plays both in content and form. This, no doubt, is a result of the influence of radicalism in the practice. From the seventies, for instance, Nigerian playwrights no longer write to entertain alone, but also to express certain ideological positions or to condemn certain societal ills. To Saint Gbilekaa:

 The contemporary Nigerian playwright bears a mark of ideological commitment and patriotism. The text of his play will invariably reflect the socio political  situation under which he writes. His themes and

subject matters naturally emerge from issues of topical  within his domain (3).

The radical playwright either writes in favour or against existing political system, especially, when it is anti-social and dictatorial. Soyinka’s The Trial of Brother Jero, for instance, mirrors the misappropriation of the Christian religion by dubious Nigerians as morally opposed to the original intention of the early missionaries who brought it into the country. In the same manner, Ola Rotimi’s Our Husband Has Gone Mad Again, satirizes the never-do-well Nigerian

politicians of the second Republic in their political antics.

In face of the resurgence of ethnic and religious bigotry leading to untold violence, at the least provocation, which in turn is occasioned by the very harsh economic atmosphere in the country, the theatre is one of the tools with the capacity to assist in the restoration of sane, enduring democratic culture in our national polity. In any developing democracy such as in Nigeria, the theatre can really make a lot of difference in reworking, reinventing and re-branding the physical, metaphysical and even the mythical vacuum in our democratic process. Besides the instrumentation of the theatre as a tool for cultural renaissance and as an arm of the Black-African Consciousness Movement, Olu Obafemi

observes that:

The theatre has equally proved to be very instrumental

 

in other struggling nations of the world, where theatrical productions, companies and dramatists have  openly confronted the ruling class, challenging them and sometimes dialoguing with the powers-that-be on  the economic, social and political rejuvenation … (ix).

Instances abound in other nations of the world, where the governments have responded to the unflattering cautions of the theatre, by way of promulgating banning decrees, harassment, censorship, intimidation and in some extreme cases, total elimination ,as in the cases of Robert Semanga of Uganda, Athol Fugard of South Africa and Ken Saro Wiwa.

Wole Soyinka also demonstrated the radical powers of the theatre when he produced his Jamaican version of The Beautification of Area Boys which unarguably impacted so much on the people’s level of identification and commitment in the struggle for a reformed Jamaica.

The theatre can, and does make a difference in the context of the society and culture in which it operates. The theatre can mediate in our young and fragile democracy, especially now that the country is at cross-roads of political history and nationhood.

We therefore ought to proactively employ the theatre to interrogate and demystify the totalitarian ideologies of neo-scramble for geographical and territorial aggrandizement which constitute a major threat to our unity. In a country where all the political parties have selfishly grounded themselves in all practical purposes, where the legislators have become pathetic jokers and the National Assembly has been turned into a mere circus show, the theatre becomes a lone voice providing a glimpse of hope for redemption at the end of the dark tunnel.

The theatre needs to take the lead in the search for an alternative social economic status quo. It should share in the burden of national healing and recoperation. In playing the role of an interventionist, the theatre should attempt to draw a broad line between the good and the evil sides of the societal life for as Sam Ukala puts it:

The good is only recognized in relation to the bad  courage in relation to cowardice, the holy against the  unholy … it is only through these relationship that the  theatre is able to imitate both sides and present them  on stage for the people’s judgment (23).

 

In Nigeria, as in most other African countries the theatre imitates for the purpose of causing not only change in the moods of the people through entertainment, but also a change in their mindsets for the betterment of the socio-political and economic structure of the nation. In a more radical sense, theatre practitioners do not only advocate for change but also spur the people to do so. This is exemplified in the popular theatre process in which the practitioner only acts as a facilitator

while the people do the actual advocation.Hence,Domba Asomba

observes that “as a society changes, its political arrangement, theatrical performances and function also continue to change along the line of the new dictate or reality” (49).

In essence, as the theatre impacts on the society, the society in turn impacts on it. As there are ethnic and socio cultural institutions calling for the restructuring or dismemberment of the Nigerian nation, so are there others that can be employed to promote and advance the ideals of federalism and true democracy in the country. The theatre is one such institution. Here, the dramatist, as the lead – drummer, has a lot of responsibilities in this business of reformation. As Femi Osofisan puts it:

We must use the weapon we have – our pen, our zeal and our people, the song of liberation… with our writing we would wash away the stigma of inferiority, rouse our dominant energy, and unmask the pest and traitors among us… our work would be a weapon in the struggle to bring our country to the foremost rank of modern nation (6).

 

Our theatre needs to be a positive interventionist, since no other cultural activity has such power of engagement, of arrest, of mobilization and of conscientization like the theatre. Hegel notes that “the new theatre of raising consciousness is aimed at liberating the masses from the clutches of oppressive elite, which made them to lose hope in its ability to stand on its feet” (20).

However, the theatre can achieve this if only it is able to surmount the attendant problems embedded in the struggle.

This research work is therefore designed to present the theatre as a veritable instrument in the quest for a transformed society, while outlining the challenges and promises therein.

1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The radical dramatist has always been a front-line soldier in the fight for a transformed society. This he does by rejecting in totality, all unacceptable standards. The political class therefore perceives the radical dramatist as a ‘thorn-in-the-flesh’.  

The dramatist, who writes about the dark sides of the socio political life of the society, has often met stiff opposition from the ruling class. This is because the radical playwright is never in the same camp with the ruling class; especially under an undemocratic atmosphere. Here, the radical dramatist is considered a threat- an impending time bomb ready to explode any time with a very dangerous outcome. This is why any government with an authoritarian poise would fight theatre radicalism to extinction.

Unfortunately, theatre and politics have proved to be an inseparable pair, since politics is part of the social life of every society, and the theatre mirrors life. The radical dramatist therefore sticks out his neck to play his role as a social commentator; else, he would not be doing his part as the watch-dog of the society.

The unending war of ideology between the radical dramatist and the ruling class has resulted in several sad tales on the part of the dramatist. Many of them have resorted to self exiles, while very many others have at one time or the other, been condemned to varying jail terms. Nikolai Gogol of Russia, Ngugi Wa Thiongo of Kenya and Wole Soyinka of Nigeria are some examples of playwrights who have suffered one form of persecution or the other from the government, for attempting to correct the ills of the society, using drama as a tool.

It will not be out of place to say that any radical dramatist, who operates in an autocratic atmosphere, unarguably constitutes himself into ‘endangered specie’. This does not however suggest that radicalism in theatre practice should give in to political intimidation; that would be more dangerous because it will open a flood-gate of political excesses, which in turn is very unhealthy to social existence.

On the other hand, some of the radicalists take their criticisms to the extreme, so much so that they also constitute themselves into problems without knowing it. Any critic, who does not exercise restrains and objectivity, would ultimately become part of the problem he otherwise ought to solve.

There is therefore, an urgent need for a point of convergence between the dramatist and the ruling class; wherein the ruling class should begin to see the dramatist, not as a rival, but as a social commentator, whose comments should be analyzed and put to good use. On the other hand, the dramatist should play his role with utmost objectivity, eschewing all forms of personal sentiments. Only then can there be peaceful coexistence between theatre and politics.

1.3 SCOPE OF STUDY

Drama and theatre speak universal language which is understood by all tribes and races. Theatre practice is therefore a universal art. In order to avoid the fugitiveness of arts, however, this work shall be limited to the Nigerian situation, but not without some quick references to the socio political possibilities in some other parts of the world, especially in Africa.

1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

This research work shall serve as a reference document, providing a kind of guide for upcoming dramatists and theatre practitioners who may wish to focus their arts on the constructive reformation of a society yarning for a total metanoya.

It shall provide a step-by-step approach to a logical and critical evaluation of the social and political malfunctioning of the society while at the same time suggesting the way forward to solving the society’s problem. The research work shall serve to expose the ills of the society, especially those emanating from bad leadership and political insincerity; opening the worm cans of the oppressors and giving the oppressed the courage to stand up to the challenge of fighting oppression to a standstill in a class conscious society such as ours. It will also serve as a research material for student and other researchers who may wish to carry out research in similar areas.

1.5 LIMITATIONS OF STUDY

This research was executed with the effort of a single individual whose financial means is limited. The researcher therefore encountered the problem of inadequate finance, especially in the search for materials.

Time constraint is also another factor that will militate against this research, as the researcher had to work against time in order to complete the work as and when due

1.6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This research shall employ both the primary and secondary sources of data collection. The MLA parenthetical style is adopted to provide written acknowledgement for the sources of information.

 

PROJECTING A STATE IMAGE THROUGH THE THEATRE: THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE RIVERS STATE COUNCIL FOR ARTS AND CULTURE.

Sharing is caring!