POWERS AND LIMITATIONS OF UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE PANELS PRIVACY AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA.

POWERS AND LIMITATIONS OF UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE PANELS PRIVACY AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA.

Abstract:

This abstract provides an overview of the complex dynamics surrounding university examination malpractice panels in Nigeria, shedding light on their powers and limitations in addressing the critical issues of privacy and terrorism. The Nigerian higher education system is grappling with the widespread problem of examination malpractice, which threatens the integrity of academic assessments. This paper explores the roles and authority vested in these panels in addressing malpractice issues, while also delving into the intricate relationship between privacy concerns and counter-terrorism efforts in the country.

University examination malpractice panels are central to maintaining academic standards, ensuring fairness, and upholding the credibility of Nigerian educational institutions. However, their powers are not without limitations, often resulting from a lack of clear legal framework and oversight. This study examines the extent to which these panels can effectively combat examination malpractice within the boundaries of privacy laws in Nigeria. It explores the potential conflicts between the need to investigate and prevent malpractice and the rights to privacy of students.

Furthermore, the paper delves into the delicate interplay between examination malpractice and national security, particularly in a country like Nigeria, which faces persistent threats of terrorism. The examination system may inadvertently be exploited as a potential tool for radicalization, recruitment, and dissemination of extremist ideologies. This study examines the ways in which university examination malpractice panels can contribute to counter-terrorism efforts, ensuring that academic institutions remain vigilant against potential security risks.

The analysis is based on an extensive review of existing literature, legal provisions, and case studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of the powers and limitations of university examination malpractice panels in the context of privacy and counter-terrorism. The findings of this study offer insights into potential policy improvements and the development of a balanced approach that safeguards academic integrity, privacy rights, and national security in Nigeria’s higher education system.

POWERS AND LIMITATIONS OF UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION MALPRACTICE PANELS PRIVACY AND TERRORISM IN NIGERIA.GET MORE LAW PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS

Sharing is caring!